AN ANTHOLOGY OF THOUGHT & EMOTION... Un'antologia di pensieri & emozioni
הידע של אלוהים לא יכול להיות מושגת על ידי המבקשים אותו, אבל רק אלה המבקשים יכול למצוא אותו

JUMP INTO THE STREAM OF LIFE!

Idolatry, Magic, and Poetic Subjectivity: Breaking the Spell of Metaphysics in Jewish and Christian Postliberal Thought

A Ph.D. dissertation by Janet L. Rumfelt 
(Florida State University, 2009)

ABSTRACT

Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik
Lutheran theologian George A. LindbeckJoseph B. Soloveitchik and George A. Lindbeck both constructed postliberal, religious methodologies that drew on modern resources as a basis for the retrieval of tradition. In the proposed dissertation, I argue that their attempts, though laudable to the extent that they create space for tradition, fall short insofar as both ideologies manifest a tendency toward the reification of tradition. Thus, despite their best attempts to the contrary, their accounts of religion construct religious identity and practice according to a fixed or quasifixed script and close religion off from the insights and critiques of contemporary culture. This occurs because they reverse liberalism’s dialectic between tradition and culture by affirming tradition over culture. This weak dialectical relation seals religion off from a robust dialogue with culture, and subsequently their theorizing results in entombing both religious practice and identity within traditional conceptions. While they allow for some level of religious innovation, it is constricted by the quasi-a priori transcendental conditions (put forward by Lindbeck) or the a priori transcendental conditions (put forward by Soloveitchik).

I offer a Wittgensteinian critique of postliberalism’s methodology and argue that their theorizing collapses into idolatry owing to a flawed conception of language that holds their theorizing captive to metaphysical assumptions. Wittgenstein’s descriptive philosophy, understood as a kind of therapy, offers both diagnosis and cure. Language becomes idolatrous when it is literalized, when it is taken to be a representation of reality. I draw on Wittgenstein’s criticisms of representationalism along with his use of the poetic imagination to show that religion can avoid the pitfalls of idolatry by onstructing a robust dialectic between tradition and culture.

This creates theoretical space for the cultivation of a poetic, religious identity. Abandoning representationalist accounts of language opens the door to a poetic understanding of grammar, which unhinges religious practitioners from the metaphysics of representationalism and frees them to live within the fluidity of life, moving back and forth between tradition and culture. In short, I show that Wittgenstein’s work can be appropriated in religion with the consequence that religious adherents are freed from living their lives according to a fixed or quasi-fixed script. Traditional textual resources are understood as offering poetic images, which must be put into a robust dialogue with culture. This poetic understanding of grammar allows for the use and play of images in the constitution of religious life and practice without literalizing or fixing any one of them.

Last, I argue that Wittgenstein’s poetics has an ethical import. Metaphysics can be violent insofar as it forces people to live or believe in a certain way. If they do not conform to the metaphysical assumptions put forward by their religious community, their identity is diminished or sometimes even violently stripped away. Wittgenstein’s work beckons readers to avoid the violence of metaphysics by freeing them to live within the “hurly burly” of life, moving to and fro between the traditional images that have sustained them and the new ones that confront them. His work cultivates a subjectivity that is ever opening outward toward difference and otherness.


You can read the full text (downloadable) of this thesis at the following link:
 https://fsu.digital.flvc.org/islandora/object/fsu:176403/datastream/PDF/view
alternatively you may email me a request for a free PDF copy.

Ludwig Wittgenstein - Watercolor Portrait by Fabrizio Cassetta

This is the relevant Table of Contents:
_______________

TABLE OF CONTENTS (pp. 374, including notes)

List of Abbreviations
Abstract

Chapter 1: Introduction
1.1. The Postliberal Self
1.2. Linguistic Idolatry
1.3. Chapter Outline

Chapter 2: Idolatry, Magic, and Metaphysics
2.1. Introduction
2.2. Biblical Conceptions of Idolatry
2.3. Idolatry and Representation
2.4. Belief and Representation in Maimonides
2.5. Belief and Representation in Mendelssohn
2.6. Idolatry as “Dead Letter”
2.7. Idolatry and Metaphysics
2.8. Logical Form as the Solution to Metaphysics
2.9. Metaphysics and Magic
2.10. Breaking the Spell of Metaphysics
2.11. Idolatry as Living Entombment
2.12. Conclusion

Chapter 3: Poetry in Motion: The Ethics of Subjectivity
3.1. Introduction
3.2. Wittgenstein’s Radicalism
3.3. The Conservatism of Science
3.4. Rules as Signposts
3.5. The Groundlessness of Belief
3.6. Trust as the Condition for the Possibility of Doubt
3.7. Are We Trapped in the Fly-Bottle?
3.8. Neither “Casual Conventionalism,” Nor Fixity, But Persuasion
3.9. Philosophical Therapy
3.10. The Aim of Philosophical Therapy: Clarity
3.11. The Aim of Philosophical Therapy: Poetic Subjectivity
3.12. Conclusion

Chapter 4: Liberalism and Its Christian Discontent:
George A. Lindbeck
4.1. Introduction
4.2. What is Postliberalism?
4.3. What is Wrong with Liberalism?
4.4. The Genealogy of The Nature of Doctrine
4.5. The “Interpretive Flow” of Culture and Tradition
4.6. Inscribing Religious Subjectivity
4.7. The Grammatical Inscription of Subjectivity
4.8. Conclusion

Chapter 5: Liberalism and Its Jewish Discontent:
Joseph B. Soloveitchik
5.1. Introduction
5.2. Critiquing Liberalism
5.3. Overcoming Liberalism’s Individualism
5.4. Engraving Subjectivity
5.5. Idolatry and Idealism
5.6. Conclusion

Chapter 6: Conclusion
6.1. The Ethics of Iconoclasm
6.2. Shifting Imagery
6.3. Is Nothing Sacred?
6.4 Lindbeck and Soloveitchik

Bibliography
Biographical Sketch
~ * ~

Painting of Praying Jew

On idolatry and Jewish thought, see also my page:

First, an analysis of Franz Rosenzweig's view that Judaism's ban on idolatry is the crucial intellectual and spiritual resource available to respond to the social implications of human finitude.

Second
an article written by Professor Moshe Halbertal with a detailed analysis of Rabbi Menachem Ha-Me’iri approach to understanding talmudic restrictions on interaction with gentiles: he demonstrates that the Me’iri’s legal tolerance was informed by his philosophical orientation drawn from the Maimonidean philosophic tradition.